Global Indoor Health Network
5G is NOT Safe: 11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC, Hearing Set for January 25, 2021 (read the press release and download the documents here).
On August 13, 2021, a U.S. federal court found the FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm. The court ordered the FCC to explain why it ignored scientific evidence showing harm from wireless radiation.
How 5G Nearly Closed the U.S. Air System
The aviation industry was warning it would cause mass calamity: 5G signals over new C-band networks could interfere with aircraft safety equipment, causing jetliners to tumble from the sky or speed off the end of runways. Aviation experts warned of “catastrophic failures leading to multiple fatalities.”
How did a long-planned technology upgrade result in a standoff that seemed to threaten public safety and one of the nation’s largest industries? The reasons are numerous, but it’s undeniable that the new 5G deployment represents an epic debacle by multiple federal agencies, the regulatory equivalent of a series of 300-pound football players awkwardly fumbling the ball as it bounces crazily into and out of their arms.
More than anything, a deep examination of the fiasco reveals profound failures in two federal agencies — the Federal Communications Commission and the FAA — that are supposed to serve the public. In the case of the FCC, the agency not only advocated for the interests of the telecommunications industry but adopted its worldview, scorning evidence of risk and making cooperation and compromise nearly impossible. In the case of the FAA, the agency inexplicably stayed silent and passively watched preparations for 5G proceed over a period of years even as the aviation industry sounded ever more dire warnings that the new networks could put air safety at risk. For more details,
read the full article.
The International Appeal against 5G has been signed by more than 300,000 scientists, doctors, etc. in 200 nations and territories, and the list of signatories grows every day.
The evidence that radiofrequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ system in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization---cancer, heart disease and diabetes---are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a scientific literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
Source: The International Appeal against 5G signed by more than 300,000 scientists, doctors, etc. in 200 nations and territories. Click here to learn about the 5G Appeal, to see the list of signatories and to add your name to the list.
Read and sign the Appeal
Some of the key points highlighted in the International Appeal are presented here:
The evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming.
The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
The idea that we will tolerate tens to hundreds of times more radiation at millimetre wavelengths is based on faulty modelling of the human body as a shell filled with a homogeneous liquid. The assumption that millimetre waves do not penetrate beyond the skin completely ignores nerves, blood vessels and other electrically conducting structures that can carry radiation-induced currents deep into the body.
Another, potentially more serious error is that phased arrays are not ordinary antennas. When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow. But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that reradiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These reradiated waves are called Brillouin precursors. They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.
The reason for the current inadequate safety guidelines is that conflicts of interest of standard-setting bodies “due to their relationships with telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation.”
To refuse to accept and apply relevant and valid scientific knowledge is ethically unacceptable. Existing research shows that 5G contravenes principles enshrined in a host of international agreements. At least 11 international agreements are being violated by the implementation of 5G.
If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet.
The public is being misled to believe that wireless technology, which emits microwave radiation, is safe. Wireless radiation is harmful -- forming a scientific literature database of more than 10,000 peer-reviewed, research papers.
The "safety" guidelines adopted by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) in 1996 are based on only the thermal (heating) effect and ignore the non-thermal effects. Those guidelines were already obsolete when adopted in 1996, but the FCC has refused to update them.