Comments from Military Experts

Barrier Trower, a retired British Secret Service Microwave Weapons specialist, states:

“The paradox is how Radio Frequency/microwave radiation can be used as a weapon to cause impairment, illness and death; and at the same time be used as a communications instrument [such as in smart meters].”

Trower continues, “By 1971, we knew everything that needed to be known.” 

(See this column for excerpts from the 1971 report by the Naval Medical Research Institute--NMRI)

“A 1976 document summarizing U.S. Defense Intelligence research lists all of the health hazards caused by wireless devices and concludes: This should be kept secret to preserve industrial profit.”

Jerry Flynn, is a retired Canadian Armed Forces captain with specialized training and 22 years of experience in Electronic Warfare and Signals Intelligence. Flynn has worked with U.S. and NATO armies in this specialized capacity. He writes:

“The U.S. military has known for decades that the RF/microwave frequencies most harmful to man are those within the band 900 MHz to 5 GHz. These frequencies penetrate all organs of the body, thus putting all human organ systems at risk. Smart meters emit these precise frequencies which, when combined with certain pulsed modulation characteristics and power densities, are most harmful to the brain, central nervous system, immune system, and can cause cancers. This is precisely why these frequencies are used in Microwave weapons of war.”

Source: April 20, 2016 article titled "Smart Meter Dangers, Who Knew and Did Not Sound the Alarm?" Click here.

Russian Scientific Report on Biological Effect of Millimeter Radiowaves (Published in 1977; declassified and approved for release on May 10, 2012)

Morphological, functional and biochemical studies conducted in humans and animals revealed that millimeter waves caused changes in the body manifested in structural alterations in the skin and internal organs, qualitative and quantitative changes of the blood and bone marrow composition and changes of the conditioned reflex activity, tissue respiration, activity of enzymes participating in the process of tissue respiration and nucleic metabolism.

As the results of histomorphological analysis showed, in the functionally active structures of tissue of the mycordium, liver, kidneys and spleen disorders of the hemodynamics were established, with disruption of the permeability of the vesicular membranes, the appearance of micronecroses and subsequent tissue dystrophy.

Moreover, qualitative and quantitative shifts were revealed in the erythrocytic and leukocytic composition of the blood of irradiated animals, indicating suppression of the hemopoietic function of the bone marrow and lymphatic system. Noted in the composition of the red blood was eosinophilia, neutrophilia and lymphopenia, and lowering of the hemoglobin level and reduction of the number of erythrocytes were observed, which was determined to a considerable degree by the retention of erythrocytes in the bone marrow. In the latter occurred an increase of the number of erythroblastic cells and decrease of cells of the leukoblastic series.

A characteristic feature of the biological effect of radiowaves was changes of the state of various sections of the central and vegetative nervous systems which involve directly or indirectly disorders of the principal functions of the organisms.



To read the report, click here.

The Mystery of the Immaculate Concussion (microwave radiation used as a weapon against U.S. citizens and government employees)

He was a senior CIA official tasked with getting tough on Russia. Then, one night in Moscow, Marc Polymeropoulos's life changed forever. He says he was hit with a mysterious weapon, joining dozens of American diplomats and spies who believe they’ve been targeted with this secret device all over the world—and even at home, on U.S. soil. Now, as a CIA investigation points the blame at Russia, the victims are left wondering why so little is being done.

Marc Polymeropoulos awoke with a start. The feeling of nausea was overwhelming. Food poisoning, he thought, and decided to head for the bathroom. But when he tried to get out of bed, he fell over. He tried to stand up and fell again. It was the early morning hours of December 5, 2017, and his Moscow hotel room was spinning around him. His ears were ringing. He felt, he recalled, “like I was going to both throw up and pass out at the same time.”

Polymeropoulos was a covert CIA operative, a jovial, burly man who likes to refer to himself as “grizzled.” Moscow was not the first time he had been on enemy territory. He had spent most of his career in the Middle East, fighting America’s long war on terrorism. He had hunted terrorists in Pakistan and Yemen. He did the same in Iraq and Afghanistan. He had been shot at, ducked under rocket fire, and had shrapnel whiz by uncomfortably close to his head. But that night, paralyzed with seasickness in the landlocked Russian capital, Polymeropoulos felt terrified and utterly helpless for the first time.

In late 2016, some two dozen Americans stationed in the revived embassy in Cuba began reporting strange new phenomena. Some heard a strange noise—sometimes high-pitched, sometimes low—and felt a sudden pressure in the skull. Others heard nothing at all, but many of them developed vertigo and nausea, and had trouble sleeping, difficulty concentrating, persistent headaches, and changes in vision and hearing. Like Polymeropoulos’s constellation of symptoms, some of these effects waxed and waned at seemingly random intervals, while others seemed impossible to cure—all to maddening effect.

In the meantime, according to several sources on Capitol Hill and at the CIA, the National Academy of Sciences has completed a report, commissioned by the State Department, assessing the potential causes of the Havana Syndrome. The report, now under review at State, apparently reached many of the same conclusions that Smith and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania did. David Relman, a Stanford immunologist and microbiologist who chaired the Academy’s committee on investigating the Havana Syndrome, told me that he is deeply frustrated that their report still has not been made public. He says it “describes distinct clinical findings and plausible mechanisms” responsible for the injuries, and that the “American people, and their elected representatives, deserve to read what we have found.”

Smith’s ongoing research has offered new insights into the Havana Syndrome—if little encouraging news for those suffering from it. In 2019, Smith and his team published a follow-up study that used advanced neuroimaging and brain-connectivity studies to look at the brains of diplomats hit in Havana. This technique showed what less sophisticated imaging had missed. The patients’ brain connectivity was severely affected, especially in the cerebellum and brain networks that control auditory and visuospatial functions. Their volumes of white matter—the inner, deeper part of the brain—were significantly reduced. White matter is made up of axons, the delicate wiring of the central nervous system. According to Smith, it was the axons and their carefully arranged structure that were damaged in people suffering from the syndrome. “If the axons break, that’s it,” he told me. “They won’t reconnect. And you’re not going to grow new axons. You only have the ones you’re born with.” The brain can learn to make up for and work around some of the damage, Smith says, but that takes time and the compensatory mechanisms are often far from perfect.

To read the October 20, 2020, article, click here.

To read the February 24, 2021, follow-up article that says the CIA is going to investigate, click here.

GIHN note: Keep in mind that cell towers and cell phones can be used to target specific individuals or locations with microwave radiation.

As early as 1973—46 years ago—WHO knew the truth about the harmful effects of microwave radiation. It published a document based on a symposium held in Warsaw on 15–18 October 1973 and attended by 60 researchers specializing in the biological effects of microwaves on humans. 

Note from GIHN:   Prior to the 1973 Warsaw symposium, the Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) had published an extensive report in 1971 on the health effects of radiofrequency radiation. The NMRI report included references to more than 2,300 published research papers on the biological responses to radiofrequency and microwave radiation.  (See above for details and the link to the 1971 NRMI report.) 

With the wireless industry, we are seeing some of the same tactics used by the tobacco/cigarette industry, which spent millions of dollars creating doubt among the public and getting industry-friendly scientists to say that smoking wasn’t harmful. Doubt is our product. Denial or non-response is the best way to deal with this. We are too powerful to have to worry about dissenters when there are so many others paying for our services: this is the industry/government/WHO ‘response’. 

Having worked for WHO and other United Nations organizations, I am aware of the politics involved and the corruption that can undermine the UN’s many worthy causes. But WHO has seriously overstepped its bounds regarding wireless radiation, promoting a cover-up that is literally costing us the earth. This radiation comes from WiFi, cell phones, cordless phones, cell towers, smart meters and other wireless devices, and it has been scientifically proven to harm all forms of life. 

Within WHO, there is a unit called the International EMF Project. It was established in 1996 “to investigate detrimental health effects from exposure” to the man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs), including radio-frequency microwave radiation, from WiFi, cell towers and other wireless devices. It is also supposed to “facilitate the development of internationally acceptable standards limiting EMF exposure”.

The EMF unit is an industry pawn. WHO may claim to be facilitating the development of supposedly safe standards for wireless radiation and assessing scientific data, but the reality is something else altogether. Its EMF Project is deliberately hiding the truth, misinforming the public and devising utterly meaningless safety standards based on unfounded science. It is also receiving funds from—and is staffed by personnel who have worked for—the very industry from which it is meant to protect us. It is also paving the way for the rollout of 5G, an extremely harmful technology that scientists say will wreak havoc on our health and our planet, in addition to monitoring and controlling almost every aspect of life. 

The head of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer, has worked for the mobile phone industry and her unit gets funding from the wireless industry, violating WHO’s own rules about conflict of interest and violating our right to health and safety. This factor alone completely discredits WHO. Van Deventer is an electrical engineer with zero medical qualifications…but lots of industry connections. Her disregard for our health reveals her medical ignorance, her indifference and her industry bias. Anyone who knows how the body works and how wireless radiation works knows that the two cannot co-exist long term without ill effects. But the World Health Organization has sold us out to the highest bidder—the wireless industry itself—while claiming to research the science, but delaying things for years so the roll-out could continue. 

WHO has failed to address or document the global epidemic of wireless-radiation sickness and electro-sensitivity. It has also ignored the appeals, evidence and petitions submitted by hundreds of highly qualified scientists, researchers and doctors, urging WHO to take appropriate action.

WHO appears to have committed almost every crime in the book, violating our human rights, the Nuremberg Code on human experimentation, and many of the UN conventions designed to protect humanity, while robbing us of our physical capacity to protect ourselves or our homes.

As reported by Dr Gabriel Cousens, MD, ND, at least 11 international agreements are being violated by the implementation of 5G, constituting “a serious planetary violation."

• The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival and

development of the child” (art. 6) …taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution” (art. 24c).

• The Nuremberg Code (1949) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with new, higher RF/microwave radiation exposure that has not been tested for safety. “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” (art. 1). It is obvious that the majority of the humans exposed to 5G will be involuntary. “No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur” (art. 5).

• The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972): “The discharge of toxic substances… in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless, must be halted in order to ensure that serious or irreversible damage is not inflicted upon ecosystems” (principle 6).

• The World Charter for Nature (1982): “Activities [that] are likely to cause irreversible damage to nature shall be avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully understood, the activities should not proceed” (art. 11).

• The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction” (principle 2).

• The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002): “There is an urgent need to… create more effective national and regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health” (para. 54k).

• The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2017): “The Parties shall…take all appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate to the maximum extent possible, detrimental effects on the environment, in particular from radioactive, toxic, and other hazardous substances and wastes” (art. 13).

• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (art. 3).

• The United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030) has as objectives and targets to “transform”, by expanding enabling environments; to “survive”, by reducing maternal and newborn mortality; and to “thrive” by ensuring health and well-being and reducing pollution-related deaths and illnesses.

• The Outer Space Treaty (1967) requires that the use of outer space be conducted “so as to avoid [its] harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth”(Art. IX).

• The United Nations Guidelines for The Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (2018): “States and international intergovernmental organizations should address… risks to people, property, public health and the environment associated with the launch, in-orbit operation and re-entry of space objects” (guideline 2.2c).

Note from GIHN: To learn the truth about 5G and RF radiation, read the International Appeal to Stop 5G signed by more than 300,000 scientists worldwide.

To read more about the WHO Cover-Up, click here .