Global Indoor Health Network
Cell towers are harmful to humans, animals and plants.
The cell tower companies and contractors will tell you that cell towers are safe. Not true.
They have known about the dangers of EMF/RF radiation for decades. Don't let the cell tower companies fool you.
Federal regulations protect the public only from the thermal (i.e., heating) risk due to short-term exposure to high intensity, cell tower radiation. The Federal regulations ignore the thousands of studies that find harmful bio-effects from long-term exposure to non-thermal levels of radiation.
Source: Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D. Detailed list of more than 900 scientific research papers on radiofrequency and electromagnetic radiation. Click here .
From Radiation Health Risks:
5G will use dramatically higher frequency radiation. The 1G through 4G technologies used less than 6 GHz frequencies. 5G will use 24 GHz to 90 GHz and up to 300 GHz frequency RF Radiation.
Cell towers around a town could do more damage to the inhabitants of the town if the density of the signal is increased. Theoretically, they could either cook the town as a whole, or point the energy at a specific person and cook them.
Click
here to read the article.
From the International Appeal against 5G:
The evidence that radiofrequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming.
The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ system in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization---cancer, heart disease and diabetes---are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a scientific literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
Source: The International Appeal against 5G signed by more than 300,000 scientists, doctors, etc. in 200 nations and territories.
Click
here to learn about the 5G Appeal, to see the list of signatories and to add your name to the list.
Click
here to read the key points included in the 5G Appeal.
More than 300,000 scientists, doctors, organizations and citizens from over 200 nations and territories have signed the International Appeal to Stop 5G.
Some of the key points highlighted in the International Appeal include:
To learn more about the International Appeal to Stop 5G or to add your name, click here .
Firefighters in California are now exempt from having 5G antennas installed at fire stations. They produced medical data indicating neurological damage to all firefighters working out of a station with 5G antennas. The firefighter’s union (IAFF) was successful in getting an exemption so that fire stations will not have 5G cell towers.
In 2015 and 2017, Acts put in from of the California Congress and Senate, respectively, were passed giving firefighters an exception from having telecommunication antennas mounted on their place of work citing health exposure risks and illness.
Dating back to a study conducted in 2004, all firefighters working in one station with a cell tower, for over five years, were given brain scans. The scans showed that firefighters had dead brain cells from radiation exposure. Noted as “pervasive, excitability of the neurons” the causation was chronic exposure to pulsed, data-modulated, radio-frequency electromagnetic microwave radiation (RF-EMR).
When neurons are stimulated, they send information back and forth, across the brain. However, when they are over-stimulated, without any rest, such as from EMF-RF radiation, the brain cells get overworked and, in time, will die.
If these types of studies were conducted on firefighters over the last 16 years, what damage is 5G, cell towers and other telecommunication technology having on the rest of humanity?
To read the article, click
here.
5G is rated as a “high impact” emerging risk affecting property and casualty claims in more than 3 years.

The text on page 29 of the Swiss Re 2019 Report is as follows:

To allow for functional network coverage and increased capacity overall, more antennas will be needed, including acceptance of higher levels of electromagnetic radiation. In some jurisdictions, the rise of threshold values will require legal adaptation. Existing concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are only likely to increase. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence.

To read the article, click here.

To read the full report from Swiss Re, click here.
There‘s no question that the government has been under the influence of industry. The FCC is a captured agency. That‘s a term that comes up time and time again with the FCC.
Captured agencies are essentially controlled by the industries they are supposed to regulate. A detailed look at FCC actions—and non-actions—shows that over the years the FCC has granted the wireless industry
pretty much what it has wanted.
“The FCC’s network of corruption doesn’t just shield industry from needed scrutiny and regulation on matters of public health and safety. Sometimes it just puts its hand directly into the public pocket and redistributes that cash to industry supplicants."
From the International Appeal to Stop 5g: "The reason for the current inadequate safety guidelines is that conflicts of interest of standard-setting bodies due to their relationships with telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation."
Source: Harvard University, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, report titled "Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates." Click here .
EXPOSED, PART I: The Corrupt FCC: Puppets of Verizon and AT&T. FCC Commissioners Ajit Pai and Brendan Carr were attorneys at Verizon, and US Attorney General William Barr helped create Verizon.
Click here to read the article.
EXPOSED, PART II: The FCC Captured, Corrupted, Consumer Advisory Committee. One would think it couldn’t have gotten much worse. Wrong!! Now, the words ‘conflicts of interest’ have been replaced with “how to buy an FCC committee.”
Click here to read the article.
The growing awareness of the health impact of the 4G/5G densification is resulting in action by policymakers worldwide.
Why have more than 200 of the world’s leading scientists signed an appeal to the WHO and the United Nations to protect public health from wireless radiation and nothing has been done?
Why have 1,000s of peer-reviewed studies, including the recently published 16-year $30 million study, that are showing a wide range of statistically significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and so many other ailments, being ignored by the FCC?
Click here to read the article and learn about the actions being taken by government entities around the world.
Barrier Trower, a retired British Secret Service Microwave Weapons specialist, states:
“The paradox is how Radio Frequency/microwave radiation can be used as a weapon to cause impairment, illness and death; and at the same time be used as a communications instrument [such as in smart meters].”
Trower continues, “By 1971, we knew everything that needed to be known.”
(See this column for excerpts from the 1971 report by the Naval Medical Research Institute--NMRI)
“A 1976 document summarizing U.S. Defense Intelligence research lists all of the health hazards caused by wireless devices and concludes: This should be kept secret to preserve industrial profit.”
Jerry Flynn, is a retired Canadian Armed Forces captain with specialized training and 22 years of experience in Electronic Warfare and Signals Intelligence. Flynn has worked with U.S. and NATO armies in this specialized capacity. He writes:
“The U.S. military has known for decades that the RF/microwave frequencies most harmful to man are those within the band 900 MHz to 5 GHz. These frequencies penetrate all organs of the body, thus putting all human organ systems at risk. Smart meters emit these precise frequencies which, when combined with certain pulsed modulation characteristics and power densities, are most harmful to the brain, central nervous system, immune system, and can cause cancers. This is precisely why these frequencies are used in Microwave weapons of war.”
Source: April 20, 2016 article titled "Smart Meter Dangers, Who Knew and Did Not Sound the Alarm?" Click
here.
Morphological, functional and biochemical studies conducted in humans and animals revealed that millimeter waves caused changes in the body manifested in structural alterations in the skin and internal organs, qualitative and quantitative changes of the blood and bone marrow composition and changes of the conditioned reflex activity, tissue respiration, activity of enzymes participating in the process of tissue respiration and nucleic metabolism.
As the results of histomorphological analysis showed, in the functionally active structures of tissue of the mycordium, liver, kidneys and spleen disorders of the hemodynamics were established, with disruption of the permeability of the vesicular membranes, the appearance of micronecroses and subsequent tissue dystrophy.
Moreover, qualitative and quantitative shifts were revealed in the erythrocytic and leukocytic composition of the blood of irradiated animals, indicating suppression of the hemopoietic function of the bone marrow and lymphatic system. Noted in the composition of the red blood was eosinophilia, neutrophilia and lymphopenia, and lowering of the hemoglobin level and reduction of the number of erythrocytes were observed, which was determined to a considerable degree by the retention of erythrocytes in the bone marrow. In the latter occurred an increase of the number of erythroblastic cells and decrease of cells of the leukoblastic series.
A characteristic feature of the biological effect of radiowaves was changes of the state of various sections of the central and vegetative nervous systems which involve directly or indirectly disorders of the principal functions of the organisms.

To read the report, click here.
He was a senior CIA official tasked with getting tough on Russia. Then, one night in Moscow, Marc Polymeropoulos's life changed forever. He says he was hit with a mysterious weapon, joining dozens of American diplomats and spies who believe they’ve been targeted with this secret device all over the world—and even at home, on U.S. soil. Now, as a CIA investigation points the blame at Russia, the victims are left wondering why so little is being done.
Marc Polymeropoulos awoke with a start. The feeling of nausea was overwhelming. Food poisoning, he thought, and decided to head for the bathroom. But when he tried to get out of bed, he fell over. He tried to stand up and fell again. It was the early morning hours of December 5, 2017, and his Moscow hotel room was spinning around him. His ears were ringing. He felt, he recalled, “like I was going to both throw up and pass out at the same time.”
Polymeropoulos was a covert CIA operative, a jovial, burly man who likes to refer to himself as “grizzled.” Moscow was not the first time he had been on enemy territory. He had spent most of his career in the Middle East, fighting America’s long war on terrorism. He had hunted terrorists in Pakistan and Yemen. He did the same in Iraq and Afghanistan. He had been shot at, ducked under rocket fire, and had shrapnel whiz by uncomfortably close to his head. But that night, paralyzed with seasickness in the landlocked Russian capital, Polymeropoulos felt terrified and utterly helpless for the first time.
In late 2016, some two dozen Americans stationed in the revived embassy in Cuba began reporting strange new phenomena. Some heard a strange noise—sometimes high-pitched, sometimes low—and felt a sudden pressure in the skull. Others heard nothing at all, but many of them developed vertigo and nausea, and had trouble sleeping, difficulty concentrating, persistent headaches, and changes in vision and hearing. Like Polymeropoulos’s constellation of symptoms, some of these effects waxed and waned at seemingly random intervals, while others seemed impossible to cure—all to maddening effect.
In the meantime, according to several sources on Capitol Hill and at the CIA, the National Academy of Sciences has completed a report, commissioned by the State Department, assessing the potential causes of the Havana Syndrome. The report, now under review at State, apparently reached many of the same conclusions that Smith and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania did. David Relman, a Stanford immunologist and microbiologist who chaired the Academy’s committee on investigating the Havana Syndrome, told me that he is deeply frustrated that their report still has not been made public. He says it “describes distinct clinical findings and plausible mechanisms” responsible for the injuries, and that the “American people, and their elected representatives, deserve to read what we have found.”
Smith’s ongoing research has offered new insights into the Havana Syndrome—if little encouraging news for those suffering from it. In 2019, Smith and his team published a follow-up study that used advanced neuroimaging and brain-connectivity studies to look at the brains of diplomats hit in Havana. This technique showed what less sophisticated imaging had missed. The patients’ brain connectivity was severely affected, especially in the cerebellum and brain networks that control auditory and visuospatial functions. Their volumes of white matter—the inner, deeper part of the brain—were significantly reduced. White matter is made up of axons, the delicate wiring of the central nervous system. According to Smith, it was the axons and their carefully arranged structure that were damaged in people suffering from the syndrome. “If the axons break, that’s it,” he told me. “They won’t reconnect. And you’re not going to grow new axons. You only have the ones you’re born with.” The brain can learn to make up for and work around some of the damage, Smith says, but that takes time and the compensatory mechanisms are often far from perfect.
To read the October 20, 2020, article, click here.
To read the February 24, 2021, follow-up article that says the CIA is going to investigate, click here.
GIHN note: Keep in mind that cell towers and cell phones can be used to target specific individuals or locations with microwave radiation.
As early as 1973—46 years ago—WHO knew the truth about the harmful effects of microwave radiation. It published a document based on a symposium held in Warsaw on 15–18 October 1973 and attended by 60 researchers specializing in the biological effects of microwaves on humans.
Note from GIHN: Prior to the 1973 Warsaw symposium, the Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) had published an extensive report in 1971 on the health effects of radiofrequency radiation. The NMRI report included references to more than 2,300 published research papers on the biological responses to radiofrequency and microwave radiation. (See above for details and the link to the 1971 NRMI report.)
With the wireless industry, we are seeing some of the same tactics used by the tobacco/cigarette industry, which spent millions of dollars creating doubt among the public and getting industry-friendly scientists to say that smoking wasn’t harmful. Doubt is our product. Denial or non-response is the best way to deal with this. We are too powerful to have to worry about dissenters when there are so many others paying for our services: this is the industry/government/WHO ‘response’.
Having worked for WHO and other United Nations organizations, I am aware of the politics involved and the corruption that can undermine the UN’s many worthy causes. But WHO has seriously overstepped its bounds regarding wireless radiation, promoting a cover-up that is literally costing us the earth. This radiation comes from WiFi, cell phones, cordless phones, cell towers, smart meters and other wireless devices, and it has been scientifically proven to harm all forms of life.
Within WHO, there is a unit called the International EMF Project. It was established in 1996 “to investigate detrimental health effects from exposure” to the man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs), including radio-frequency microwave radiation, from WiFi, cell towers and other wireless devices. It is also supposed to “facilitate the development of internationally acceptable standards limiting EMF exposure”.
The EMF unit is an industry pawn. WHO may claim to be facilitating the development of supposedly safe standards for wireless radiation and assessing scientific data, but the reality is something else altogether. Its EMF Project is deliberately hiding the truth, misinforming the public and devising utterly meaningless safety standards based on unfounded science. It is also receiving funds from—and is staffed by personnel who have worked for—the very industry from which it is meant to protect us. It is also paving the way for the rollout of 5G, an extremely harmful technology that scientists say will wreak havoc on our health and our planet, in addition to monitoring and controlling almost every aspect of life.
The head of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer, has worked for the mobile phone industry and her unit gets funding from the wireless industry, violating WHO’s own rules about conflict of interest and violating our right to health and safety. This factor alone completely discredits WHO. Van Deventer is an electrical engineer with zero medical qualifications…but lots of industry connections. Her disregard for our health reveals her medical ignorance, her indifference and her industry bias. Anyone who knows how the body works and how wireless radiation works knows that the two cannot co-exist long term without ill effects. But the World Health Organization has sold us out to the highest bidder—the wireless industry itself—while claiming to research the science, but delaying things for years so the roll-out could continue.
WHO has failed to address or document the global epidemic of wireless-radiation sickness and electro-sensitivity. It has also ignored the appeals, evidence and petitions submitted by hundreds of highly qualified scientists, researchers and doctors, urging WHO to take appropriate action.
WHO appears to have committed almost every crime in the book, violating our human rights, the Nuremberg Code on human experimentation, and many of the UN conventions designed to protect humanity, while robbing us of our physical capacity to protect ourselves or our homes.
As reported by Dr Gabriel Cousens, MD, ND, at least 11 international agreements are being violated by the implementation of 5G, constituting “a serious planetary violation."
• The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival and
development of the child” (art. 6) …taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution” (art. 24c).
• The Nuremberg Code (1949) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with new, higher RF/microwave radiation exposure that has not been tested for safety. “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” (art. 1). It is obvious that the majority of the humans exposed to 5G will be involuntary. “No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur” (art. 5).
• The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972): “The discharge of toxic substances… in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless, must be halted in order to ensure that serious or irreversible damage is not inflicted upon ecosystems” (principle 6).
• The World Charter for Nature (1982): “Activities [that] are likely to cause irreversible damage to nature shall be avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully understood, the activities should not proceed” (art. 11).
• The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction” (principle 2).
• The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002): “There is an urgent need to… create more effective national and regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health” (para. 54k).
• The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2017): “The Parties shall…take all appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate to the maximum extent possible, detrimental effects on the environment, in particular from radioactive, toxic, and other hazardous substances and wastes” (art. 13).
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (art. 3).
• The United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030) has as objectives and targets to “transform”, by expanding enabling environments; to “survive”, by reducing maternal and newborn mortality; and to “thrive” by ensuring health and well-being and reducing pollution-related deaths and illnesses.
• The Outer Space Treaty (1967) requires that the use of outer space be conducted “so as to avoid [its] harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth”(Art. IX).
• The United Nations Guidelines for The Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (2018): “States and international intergovernmental organizations should address… risks to people, property, public health and the environment associated with the launch, in-orbit operation and re-entry of space objects” (guideline 2.2c).
Note from GIHN: To learn the truth about 5G and RF radiation, read the International Appeal to Stop 5G signed by more than 300,000 scientists worldwide.
To read more about the WHO Cover-Up, click here .
The Global Indoor Health Network is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to providing education and awareness of the health effects of mold and other indoor contaminants. Our worldwide network of experts and laypersons are working together to promote healthy indoor environments in homes, schools and businesses.
Contact Us to become a member.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
DISCLAIMER: The contents of this website (including text, graphics and images) are for informational purposes only and do not constitute medical advice. The content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.
All Rights Reserved | Global Indoor Health Network, Inc.